yep, that sounds reasonable.  in that case it is good to remember that
those heuristics are all designed for eventual translation and not for
doing well at AER.  i can easily imagine some other set of heuristics
which will do well at word alignment-like tasks and not necessarily
pan-out into good bleu scores etc.

Miles

2009/3/4 J.Tiedemann <[email protected]>:
>
> it depends on what you want to do. I was interested in the word alignment in
> particular. not necessarily for running MT with moses.
>
> for SMT I usually just use the default grow-diag-final-and which probably
> gives the best input anyway. this is, I guess, because it's better on
> recall. AER seems to strongly prefer precision.
>
> jorg
>
>
> On Wed, 4 Mar 2009 13:46:36 +0000
>  Miles Osborne <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> one thing to remember is that the link between AER and BLEU is not
>> obvious;  in my view at least AER-like scores should be treated with
>> skepticism and the real merit of an alignment approach should be the
>> corresponding translation performance (BLEU etc).
>>
>> can you provide associated BLEU scores for those AER numbers?
>>
>> Miles
>>
>> 2009/3/4 J.Tiedemann <[email protected]>:
>>>
>>> hi,
>>>
>>> I'm just wondering if Och's "refined" heuristics is also implemented
>>> in Moses. The "grow-diag" is not exactly the same as far as I
>>> understand.
>>>
>>> The reason why I'm asking is because I found out that in all of my
>>> experiments with europarl data the "intersection" always produces the
>>> best results in terms of AER (for example using the wpt03 data)
>>> whereas I see better performances reported for refined compared with
>>> intersection in various papers (also for the wpt03 data). However, I
>>> cannot believe that the grow-heuristics would perform so much worse
>>> than the original "refined" approach.
>>>
>>> My AER scores with standard GIZA settings and moses heuristics  for
>>> wpt03 data are the following:
>>>
>>> moses.intersect             AER = 0.0613
>>> moses.grow-diag             AER = 0.0843
>>> moses.grow-diag-final-and   AER = 0.0926
>>> moses.grow-diag-final       AER = 0.1312
>>> moses.srctotgt              AER = 0.1039
>>> moses.tgttosrc              AER = 0.1162
>>> moses.union                 AER = 0.1444
>>>
>>> does this sound reasonable?
>>>
>>>
>>> Jorg
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Moses-support mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
>> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>
>



-- 
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
_______________________________________________
Moses-support mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support

Reply via email to