Hi,

if the input is provided as a lattice, then it is not
the case that all translations have the same number
of unknown words.

-phi

On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Kaveh Taghipour
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> Thanks. You are right. But I think there is no need for such a penalty,
> since all candidates for a given source sentence contain the same number of
> OOVs and so the penalty does not help at all. Do you know the reason?
>
> Cheers,
> Kaveh
>
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 9:53 PM, Christian Hardmeier <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> I think you're on the right track. For some reason, moses doesn't report
>> the OOV penalty feature, which adds a hardcoded penalty of -100 to the total
>> score for each input word that was copied to the output because no suitable
>> translation was found in the phrase table. Your test sentence probably
>> contains two unknown words that account for the -200 difference between the
>> score you calculated and the one output by the decoder. Does that make
>> sense?
>>
>> Best,
>> Christian
>>
>> Kaveh Taghipour <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >Hi,
>> >
>> >I have generated an N-best list with moses, but I do not know how to
>> > compute
>> >the final score. I tried a log-linear model but came up with a wrong
>> > number.
>> >For example:
>> >
>> >moses.ini:
>> >----------------------------------------
>> ># distortion (reordering) weight
>> >[weight-d]
>> >0.120662
>> >
>> ># language model weights
>> >[weight-l]
>> >0.251853
>> >
>> ># translation model weights
>> >[weight-t]
>> >0.0675335
>> >0.103843
>> >0.0720954
>> >0.00630806
>> >0.101934
>> >
>> ># word penalty
>> >[weight-w]
>> >-0.275771
>> >
>> >Assuming a log-linear model, the score for the following sentence should
>> > be
>> >*-54.076* but the decoder prints:
>> >
>> >0 ||| ....  ||| d: 0 lm: -219.367 w: -6 tm: -3.17999 -4.43847 -2.63049
>> >-3.87513 3.99959 ||| *-254.076*
>> >
>> >Thank you in advance for helping.
>> >
>> >Cheers,
>> >Kaveh
>> >
>> >_______________________________________________
>> >Moses-support mailing list
>> >[email protected]
>> >http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moses-support mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
>
>

_______________________________________________
Moses-support mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support

Reply via email to