Hi Neda

Yes, the variation you observe is normal.

If you have the features in your system that you described in your original 
post ( LM: 3gram, Reordering, msd-bidirectional-fe, Alignment: grow-diag-final-
and, phrase) then you'll have 14 features. 

I quickly scanned the article and it refers to using a 'baseline Phrase-based 
system (Moses)' - unfortunately I couldn't see any more details - but this is 
likely to have the same features as yours,

cheers - Barry

On Monday 31 Oct 2011 11:32:45 Neda NoorMohammadi wrote:
> Thanks your answer in advance,
> 
> I read your article and I am running my system according to your offer.
> But, note that my experiment is related to a system with only 6 features. I
> think, this result is normal for a system with many features.
> Results using BLEU in 2 times run system are: 25.27% , 0.2407. (There is a
> gap between results- more than 1 percent in some cases)
> 
> Is this result normal yet?
> 
> Neda Noormohammadi
> 
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Barry Haddow
> 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
> > Hi Neda
> >
> > If you're interested in determining whether translation method A is
> > better than method B, or not, then you shouldn't use predictable-seed.
> > You should run
> > mert several times and take the average score. Because if you run with
> > predictable seeds then all you are verifying is whether A beats B using
> > the rather arbitrary seed settings from deterministic mert, nothing more.
> >
> > I'd suggest that you read the paper I linked - it explains these points
> > and more,
> >
> > cheers - Barry
> >
> > On Monday 31 Oct 2011 08:35:01 Nicola Bertoldi wrote:
> > > Hi Neda
> > >
> > > There is also a parameter of mert-moses.pl      "--predictable-seed"
> > >  (see the help) which makes MERT  deterministic.
> > >
> > > In general, MERT procedure relies on an initial seed    seed_t   at
> > > each iteration   t   for the creation of the (20 by default) random
> > > starting points for the optimization;  not that   seed_i   differs from
> > > seed_j
> >
> >  (if
> >
> > >  i differs from j)
> > >
> > > If you activate this flag "--predictable-seed",  seed_i still  differs
> >
> > from
> >
> > >  seed_j BUT the sequence seed_1, seed_2, ... seed_N   is always the
> > > same; and hence, the random starting points considered for the
> > > optimization
> >
> > are
> >
> > >  always the same, so that the final results   of the MERT is always the
> > >  same.
> > >
> > > best regards
> > > Nicola
> > >
> > > On Oct 29, 2011, at 6:37 PM, Patrik Lambert wrote:
> > > > Hi Neda,
> > > >
> > > > this happens because the seed used in the MERT optimizer depends by
> > > > default on the moment on which you launch it.
> > > > If you need deterministic MERT runs, you can set the seed by adding
> >
> > this
> >
> > > > switch to the mert-moses.pl call:
> > > >
> > > > --mertargs=" -r $seed "
> > > >
> > > > Patrik
> > > >
> > > > Le 29/10/2011 18:11, [email protected] a écrit :
> > > >> Message: 3
> > > >> Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 17:05:11 +0100
> > > >> From: Barry Haddow<[email protected]>
> > > >> Subject: Re: [Moses-support] mert-moses.pl script
> > > >> To: [email protected]
> > > >> Message-ID:<[email protected]>
> > > >> Content-Type: Text/Plain;  charset="utf-8"
> > > >>
> > > >> Hi Neda
> > > >>
> > > >> Yes, this is quite normal. The best plan is to do several runs and
> >
> > take
> >
> > > >> the average bleu. See this paper for a discussion
> > > >>
> > > >> http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~jhclark/pubs/significance.pdf
> > > >>
> > > >> cheers - Barry
> > > >>
> > > >> On Saturday 29 Oct 2011 10:09:29 Neda NoorMohammadi wrote:
> > > >>> hello,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> In my experiment this is happening:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I am running mert-moses.pl script  on a same develop set and
> >
> > configure
> >
> > > >>> file in a same condition but by each execution I gain different
> >
> > weights
> >
> > > >>> which leads to different Bleu (about 1%) (note that these
> > > >>> executions are independent of each other and are initialized to
> > > >>> predefine
> >
> > weights
> >
> > > >>> of moses.ini).
> > > >>>
> > > >>> The used features in configure file are: LM: 3gram, Reordering:
> > > >>> msd-bidirectional-fe, Alignment: grow-diag-final-and, phrase
> > > >>> scores.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Is it normal? What is your suggestion?
> > > >>> In this situation what is my baseline? The best one or the worth?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Neda Noormohammadi
> > > >>
> > > >> ------------------------------
> > > >>
> > > >> _______________________________________________
> > > >> Moses-support mailing list
> > > >> [email protected]
> > > >> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> End of Moses-support Digest, Vol 60, Issue 46
> > > >> *********************************************
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Moses-support mailing list
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Moses-support mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Moses-support mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
> 

_______________________________________________
Moses-support mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support

Reply via email to