Dear list, I have a question similar to Hieu's question. Is there a way to skip filtering and binarizing tables by using suffix arrays?
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Hieu Hoang <[email protected]> Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 18:24:44 +0700 Subject: Re: [Moses-support] no filtering of phrase-table or reordering table To: John Morgan <[email protected]> i don't know myself. However, I think suffix array only works with phrase-based for now. Check with the mailing list On 4 November 2011 18:20, John Morgan <[email protected]> wrote: > Hieu, I don't have an answer to your question, but I have a related > question. Instead of filtering and binarizing, is there a way to use > suffix arrays instead? I see sections in the experiment.meta file > refering to hiero and suffix arrays. Could someone give an example > configuration that uses hiero and suffix arrays. > Thanks, > John > > > On 11/3/11, Hieu Hoang <[email protected]> wrote: > > is there a way to prevent the filtering and binarizing of the models > before > > tuning and evaluation by the EMS? > > > > I'm passing it a prepared ini file with all the models already binarized > so > > the EMS shouldn't touch them > > > > > -- > Regards, > John J Morgan > -- Regards, John J Morgan _______________________________________________ Moses-support mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
