are you looking to use it for phrase-based or hierarchical decoding?
On 04/11/2011 18:30, John Morgan wrote: > Dear list, I have a question similar to Hieu's question. > Is there a way to skip filtering and binarizing tables by using suffix arrays? > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Hieu Hoang<[email protected]> > Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 18:24:44 +0700 > Subject: Re: [Moses-support] no filtering of phrase-table or reordering table > To: John Morgan<[email protected]> > > i don't know myself. However, I think suffix array only works with > phrase-based for now. Check with the mailing list > > On 4 November 2011 18:20, John Morgan<[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hieu, I don't have an answer to your question, but I have a related >> question. Instead of filtering and binarizing, is there a way to use >> suffix arrays instead? I see sections in the experiment.meta file >> refering to hiero and suffix arrays. Could someone give an example >> configuration that uses hiero and suffix arrays. >> Thanks, >> John >> >> >> On 11/3/11, Hieu Hoang<[email protected]> wrote: >>> is there a way to prevent the filtering and binarizing of the models >> before >>> tuning and evaluation by the EMS? >>> >>> I'm passing it a prepared ini file with all the models already binarized >> so >>> the EMS shouldn't touch them >>> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> John J Morgan >> > > _______________________________________________ Moses-support mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
