Thanks, Lane.

On 16 November 2011 15:11, Lane Schwartz <[email protected]> wrote:

> I definitely make use of SGE when I run my experiments. I had
> forgotten Barry's post. I haven't updated my code in a while, but if
> SGE is currently broken, I'll definitely want to help fix it. I won't
> be able to look at things until at least December, though, and more
> likely January.
>
> Lane
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Guchun Zhang <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> > Thanks for Barry's post back in January. I wasn't a member at that time,
> so
> > didn't receive such a post. My motives will be mostly because of cost.
> With
> > SGE, I can reuse some of the old but still usable machines and expand the
> > network when necessary. Plus, it is quite unlikely I will be able to get
> > hold of machines as powerful as yours. So if I want to have a relatively
> > faster Moses system, SGE is a pretty good option for me.
> > Hope this makes sense.
> > Cheers,
> > Guchun
> >
> > On 16 November 2011 12:27, Tom Hoar <
> [email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Guchun,
> >>
> >> May I ask what motivates you to work with SGE? Barry Haddow posted this
> >> comment on the list  in January this year. We have similar experiences.
> >>
> >> Tom
> >>
> >> -------- Original Message --------
> >> Subject: Re: [Moses-support] running moses on a cluster with sge
> >> Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 09:52:11 +0000
> >> From: Barry Haddow <[email protected]>
> >> To: [email protected]
> >> Cc: Tom Hoar <[email protected]>, "Noubours, Sandra"
> >> <[email protected]>
> >>
> >> Hi Sandra
> >>
> >> The short answer is that it really depends how big your models are.
> >> Running on a cluster helps speed up tuning because most of the time in
> >> tuning is spent decoding, which can be easily parallelised by splitting
> up
> >> the file into chunks. So each of the individual machines should be
> capable
> >> of loading your models and running a decoder.
> >>
> >> The problem with using a cluster (as opposed to multicore) is that each
> >> machine has to have its own ram, and if you want to load large models
> then
> >> you need a lot of ram. Whereas with multicore, each thread can access
> the
> >> same model. Sure, binarising saves a lot on ram usage, but it slows you
> down
> >> and puts a lot of load on the filesystem which can cause problems on
> >> clusters.
> >>
> >> Our group's machines are a mixture of 8 and 16 core Xeon 2.67GHz, with
> >> 36-72G ram, no sge. We also have access to the university cluster, but
> since
> >> the most ram you can get is 16G and sge hold jobs don't work at the
> moment
> >> we don't really use it for moses any more,
> >>
> >> hope that helps - regards - Barry
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 22:02:48 +0000, Guchun Zhang <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Sorry, forgot to attach the mert.out file.
> >>
> >> Guchun
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Guchun Zhang
> >
> > Localization Engineer
> > Alpha CRC Ltd | Cambridge, UK
> > Direct: +44 1223 431035
> > [email protected]
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Moses-support mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
> >
> >
>
>


-- 

*Guchun Zhang*

Localization Engineer
Alpha CRC Ltd | Cambridge, UK
Direct: +44 1223 431035
[email protected] <[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
Moses-support mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support

Reply via email to