yes, that's typical. as a comparison, my 3.9GB (text, gz) reordering table takes up 40GB when binarized.
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Wang Pidong <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I am now trying to binarize a big lexical reordering table, * > reordering-table.wbe-msd-bidirectional-fe.gz*, whose size is 2.4GB after > gzip. > After about 6-hour running of the *processLexicalTable* tool, the > incomplete binarized table (about 68GB) used up all my disk space. > > Does anyone have the experience of binarizing big lexical reordering table? > Is my case typical? do I need to increase my disk space then try again? > > Thank you in advance! > > Best wishes! > Pidong > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moses-support mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support > >
_______________________________________________ Moses-support mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
