Thanks a lot! I am going to increase my disk space and try again. Best wishes! Pidong
On 3 February 2012 12:11, Hieu Hoang <[email protected]> wrote: > yes, that's typical. > > as a comparison, my 3.9GB (text, gz) reordering table takes up 40GB when > binarized. > > On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Wang Pidong <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I am now trying to binarize a big lexical reordering table, * >> reordering-table.wbe-msd-bidirectional-fe.gz*, whose size is 2.4GB after >> gzip. >> After about 6-hour running of the *processLexicalTable* tool, the >> incomplete binarized table (about 68GB) used up all my disk space. >> >> Does anyone have the experience of binarizing big lexical reordering >> table? >> Is my case typical? do I need to increase my disk space then try again? >> >> Thank you in advance! >> >> Best wishes! >> Pidong >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moses-support mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support >> >> > -- Wang Pidong Department of Computer Science School of Computing National University of Singapore
_______________________________________________ Moses-support mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
