Hi, no, everything should be LGPL.
We will need to fix the files that say otherwise. -phi On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Gautham N <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Phillip. I'm confused because the files in the src folder say that > they are under LGPL 2.1. And, some of the script files in contrib folder say > that they are distributed under GNU GPL v3 license. Could you please > clarify? > > > Thanks! > > > On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Philipp Koehn <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> it's the latest version of the license (v3.0): >> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl.html >> >> -phi >> >> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Gautham N <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > Could someone please let me know the exact version of LGPL that Moses >> > comes >> > under. >> > >> > >> > Thanks! >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Moses-support mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support >> > > > _______________________________________________ Moses-support mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
