Reminds me of http://xkcd.com/552/
W dniu 10.08.2012 16:37, Lane Schwartz pisze: > Well, it may be mostly bogus, but it's not *totally* bogus. :) > > I use this number when I perform more advanced corpus splitting (see > my upcoming MT Marathon paper!), and while I can't claim to know that > it's accurate, it does at least seem to be well-proportioned. That is, > very short sentences that are processed very quickly report a small > number here, and very long sentences that are processed very slowly > report a large number here. > > On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Marcin Junczys-Dowmunt > <[email protected]> wrote: >> I on the other hand always had the impression that the time reported >> there is a total bogus, especially for multi-threaded decoding. >> >> W dniu 10.08.2012 16:26, Lane Schwartz pisze: >>> Not sure what it's supposed to be, but I like having some result that >>> reports the total per-sentence processing time, including both >>> collecting options and search. >>> >>> I'd just always assumed that the search time reported was that number, >>> I figured that to get just the search time you could subtract the >>> Collecting Options time. >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Jonathan Clark <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I just noticed that the moses time reporting is rather misleading. >>>> >>>> We see lines: >>>> Collecting options took 13.390 seconds >>>> Search took 13.390 seconds >>>> Translation took 13.390 seconds >>>> >>>> >>>> However, the "Search took X seconds" count also includes collecting >>>> options, >>>> which seems wrong. I have a patch for this I can push, but I just want to >>>> make sure I'm not missing something. This is broken, right? >>>> >>>> Jon > _______________________________________________ Moses-support mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
