I will do that. Thanks, Hieu!
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Hieu Hoang <[email protected]> wrote: > it should be threadsafe these days. if you find out otherwise, i'll do my > best to fix it > > Don't use IRSTLM or the old binary phrase-table. > > > On 23/07/2015 00:26, James H. Cross III wrote: >> >> Hi: >> >> I also noticed that decoding with lattice input is not known to be >> thread safe ( http://www.statmt.org/moses/?n=Moses.Optimize ). Does >> this concern also extend to confusion network input? >> >> Thanks again, >> James >> >> >> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 12:22 PM, James H. Cross III >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Definitely at least placeholders and constraints on reordering. >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Hieu Hoang <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> sounds ok. the xml markup is used for a number of things (forced >>>> translation, placeholders, constraint on reordering). Which >>>> functionality do >>>> you want to implement? >>>> >>>> On 22/07/2015 22:20, James H. Cross III wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Hieu: >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for the response! I would like to look into adding this >>>>> functionality myself. >>>>> >>>>> After a first pass, it looks like a good starting point would be >>>>> adding functionality for interpreting XML (e.g., where an input line >>>>> could contain a single XML tag rather than a word column) to the >>>>> ConfusionNet class, and then adding functionality to enforce the >>>>> decoding constraints to the TranslationOptionCollectionConfusionNet >>>>> class. Let me know if this impression seems correct to you. >>>>> >>>>> Any other advice or caveats regarding this undertaking would also be >>>>> much appreciated! >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> James >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 5:22 AM, Hieu Hoang <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> i guess lack of interest. XML markup is usually used by more >>>>>> application-focused users who don't usually use complicated things >>>>>> like >>>>>> confusion networks, and confusion networks are used mainly by >>>>>> researchers >>>>>> who don't use xml markups >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 18/07/2015 00:35, James H. Cross III wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Is it still the case that XML markup is not supported for confusion >>>>>>> network (or lattice) input? If not, are the reasons for not >>>>>>> supporting >>>>>>> this feature because implementing it imposes particular difficulties >>>>>>> or simply due to lack of interest? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> James >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Moses-support mailing list >>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support >>>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Hieu Hoang >>>>>> Researcher >>>>>> New York University, Abu Dhabi >>>>>> http://www.hoang.co.uk/hieu >>>>>> >>>> -- >>>> Hieu Hoang >>>> Researcher >>>> New York University, Abu Dhabi >>>> http://www.hoang.co.uk/hieu >>>> > > -- > Hieu Hoang > Researcher > New York University, Abu Dhabi > http://www.hoang.co.uk/hieu > _______________________________________________ Moses-support mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
