[Replies inline] On Wed, 30 May 2018 03:59:23 +0800 liling tan <[email protected]> wrote:
> But I agree with Matt that if everyone that contributed give their > consensus, there's no reason why the tokenizer can't be relicensed. > Some of them have already given the OK and replied to previous > threads. But to reach everyone I shall try BCC-ing all of them in > this reply. > > [...] > For those who are BCC-ed, would you agree to allow the Python port of > the Moses tokenizer to have MIT license instead of LGPL? Not sure if I replied earlier, but relicencing is ok by me. I cannot remember what I've actually contributed but it must've been some pretty trivial oneliner for Finnish tokenisations. -- Doktor Tommi A Pirinen, Computational Linguist, <https://flammie.github.io/purplemonkeydishwasher/>, Universität Hamburg, Hamburger Zentrum für Sprachkorpora <http://hzsk.de>. CLARIN-D Entwickler. President of ACL SIGUR SIG for Uralic languages <http://gtweb.uit.no/sigur/>. I tend to follow inline-posting style in desktop e-mail messages. _______________________________________________ Moses-support mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
