Send Motion-user mailing list submissions to
motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-user
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
motion-user-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net
You can reach the person managing the list at
motion-user-ow...@lists.sourceforge.net
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Motion-user digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. State of play with Motion (Edward Kelly)
2. Re: State of play with Motion (Edward Kelly)
3. Re: State of play with Motion (Adam Goryachev)
4. Re: State of play with Motion (tosiara)
5. Getting Motion running on ReadyNas (Harry Foerster)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 21:43:56 +0000
From: Edward Kelly <briz...@live.com>
Subject: [Motion-user] State of play with Motion
To: "motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net"
<motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID:
<me1pr01mb1810ebd11c2a6a791bc8c4ced6...@me1pr01mb1810.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> What is the current state of play with Motion. For example, is there
> active development underway and is this mailing list functional ?
>
> I wish to setup a number of 4 camera CCTV systems, possibly with an
> additional couple of IP cameras and that I can view remotely without
> needing Internet explorer and / or ActiveX
>
> After pulling most of my hair out trying to make sense of ZoneMinder,
> I'm hoping to find some software that doesn't require a 4 Zeon
> processor / 50Gb RAM machine / database witchcraft and at least five
> fulltime geeks. Ideally I'd prefer a *nix operating system but if all
> else fails I guess I'll need to explore the Microcrap alternatives.
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 23:14:13 +0000
From: Edward Kelly <briz...@live.com>
Subject: Re: [Motion-user] State of play with Motion
To: "motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net"
<motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID:
<me1pr01mb1810cbeedb62b6b29fff2c77d6...@me1pr01mb1810.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
The immediate issue for me is whether or not I can install Motion
without needing to include a database. I've always found MySQL
witchcraft and something I'd prefer not to dabble in, at least until I
get Motion functioning. I notice that none of the commercial DVR
applications appear to involve a database so why do open source
applications use databases ?
On 13/01/2017 07:43, Edward Kelly wrote:
>
>> What is the current state of play with Motion. For example, is there
>> active development underway and is this mailing list functional ?
>>
>> I wish to setup a number of 4 camera CCTV systems, possibly with an
>> additional couple of IP cameras and that I can view remotely without
>> needing Internet explorer and / or ActiveX
>>
>> After pulling most of my hair out trying to make sense of ZoneMinder,
>> I'm hoping to find some software that doesn't require a 4 Zeon
>> processor / 50Gb RAM machine / database witchcraft and at least five
>> fulltime geeks. Ideally I'd prefer a *nix operating system but if
>> all else fails I guess I'll need to explore the Microcrap alternatives.
>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 10:21:20 +1100
From: Adam Goryachev <mailingli...@websitemanagers.com.au>
Subject: Re: [Motion-user] State of play with Motion
To: motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Message-ID:
<3089ec7b-8b5f-99d7-8b0d-1ce6504f7...@websitemanagers.com.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
On 13/01/17 10:14, Edward Kelly wrote:
> The immediate issue for me is whether or not I can install Motion
> without needing to include a database. I've always found MySQL
> witchcraft and something I'd prefer not to dabble in, at least until I
> get Motion functioning. I notice that none of the commercial DVR
> applications appear to involve a database so why do open source
> applications use databases ?
>
>
> On 13/01/2017 07:43, Edward Kelly wrote:
>>> What is the current state of play with Motion. For example, is there
>>> active development underway and is this mailing list functional ?
>>>
>>> I wish to setup a number of 4 camera CCTV systems, possibly with an
>>> additional couple of IP cameras and that I can view remotely without
>>> needing Internet explorer and / or ActiveX
>>>
>>> After pulling most of my hair out trying to make sense of ZoneMinder,
>>> I'm hoping to find some software that doesn't require a 4 Zeon
>>> processor / 50Gb RAM machine / database witchcraft and at least five
>>> fulltime geeks. Ideally I'd prefer a *nix operating system but if
>>> all else fails I guess I'll need to explore the Microcrap alternatives.
>
FYI, I manage an installation of motion with 2 active cameras, it is
using 6 CPU's and 8GB RAM. The HDD's and CPU are the two biggest issues,
I'm recording in 1600x1040 resolution.
It has been working very well for the past few months (have been slowly
adding cameras for the last year or more).
I'm using 100% network cameras (Raspberry Pi + Camera which streams the
raw data over IP to motion.
Oh, and I don't use any DB...
Regards,
Adam
--
Adam Goryachev Website Managers www.websitemanagers.com.au
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 02:57:04 +0200
From: tosiara <tosi...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Motion-user] State of play with Motion
To: Motion discussion list <motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID:
<CACHTdwTTTbbxWaqUULNad-JMRhDaUnzmJ6AvGMz=+vadw7f...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Motion supports database, but that's optional. You can just run a
daemon that records locally.
Latest version is 4.0.1. You can grab the latest source from
https://github.com/Motion-Project or find a package for your system.
Regarding performance. 720p@10fps stream would require a full core of
recent x86_64 CPU. Recording 4x720p cameras on a quad core system
could be an issue (depends on hardware). So either give enough cpu
power or reduce resolution/framerate.
Live monitoring is possible over any browser that can read mjpeg, like
Firefox. You don't need neither IE, nor any plugin.
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 1:14 AM, Edward Kelly <briz...@live.com> wrote:
> The immediate issue for me is whether or not I can install Motion
> without needing to include a database. I've always found MySQL
> witchcraft and something I'd prefer not to dabble in, at least until I
> get Motion functioning. I notice that none of the commercial DVR
> applications appear to involve a database so why do open source
> applications use databases ?
>
>
> On 13/01/2017 07:43, Edward Kelly wrote:
>>
>>> What is the current state of play with Motion. For example, is there
>>> active development underway and is this mailing list functional ?
>>>
>>> I wish to setup a number of 4 camera CCTV systems, possibly with an
>>> additional couple of IP cameras and that I can view remotely without
>>> needing Internet explorer and / or ActiveX
>>>
>>> After pulling most of my hair out trying to make sense of ZoneMinder,
>>> I'm hoping to find some software that doesn't require a 4 Zeon
>>> processor / 50Gb RAM machine / database witchcraft and at least five
>>> fulltime geeks. Ideally I'd prefer a *nix operating system but if
>>> all else fails I guess I'll need to explore the Microcrap alternatives.
>>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors
> Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms.
> With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE.
> Training and support from Colfax.
> Order your platform today. http://sdm.link/xeonphi
> _______________________________________________
> Motion-user mailing list
> Motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-user
> https://motion-project.github.io/
>
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/options/motion-user
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 10:51:15 -0600
From: "Harry Foerster" <hfoers...@shaw.ca>
Subject: [Motion-user] Getting Motion running on ReadyNas
To: "'Motion-User'" <motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <000001d26e86$6d7d58d0$48780a70$@shaw.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hello,
I'm new to Motion and am interesting in using it on my Netgear ReadyNas
Ultra 2 Plus.
I would like to know if it is possible "as-is", with only additional modules
loaded, and what version of Motion would be required.
The ReadyNas is running Netgear's firmware Raidiator 4.2.30 which provides
Linux version 2.6.37.6.RNx86.64.2.4 (gcc version 4.1.2 2006115
(pre-release) Debian 4.1.1-21).
If this isn't possible "as-is", what would have to be done for Motion to
work on this NAS unit?
Thankyou for your assistance.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors
Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms.
With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE.
Training and support from Colfax.
Order your platform today. http://sdm.link/xeonphi
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Motion-user mailing list
Motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-user
End of Motion-user Digest, Vol 128, Issue 4
*******************************************
