Send Motion-user mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-user
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Motion-user digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. MotioneyeOS: issue with Timestamp ([email protected])
2. Re: using netcam_highres parameter (thomas)
3. Foscam IP cams (Adam Briggs)
4. Re: Foscam IP cams (Adam Briggs)
5. Re: Foscam IP cams (Joseph Heenan)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 19:54:43 +0100 (CET)
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Motion-user] MotioneyeOS: issue with Timestamp
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
I have successfully implemented a surveillance system using MotioneyeOS; I have
two RB PI Zero Ws as surveillance cameras and a PB PI Zero as Hub.
I have a couple of questions, if somebody can help me:
1) why the timestamp on video cameras starts from 1970 and not from the current
date? Both are connected to the HUB via WIFI and the setting is:
Date Method HTTP
HTTP Host dates google.com
Date Updating Timeout 10 seconds
Date Updating Interval 900 seconds
I also tried with NTP but it does not work.
2) What is the port number that must be inserted in the forwarding of the
Router to access the HUB from the outside?
thank you very much :)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 21:01:27 +0100
From: thomas <[email protected]>
To: Motion discussion list <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Motion-user] using netcam_highres parameter
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
(my last post was unreadible due html formatting, so once more...)
i have done some tests.
(Stream0 set to 1920x1080@10fps and 3MBit)
2 cams 320*180 -> 130 percent (motion did rescale to 184 because of
modulo 8)
2 cams 640*360-> 130 percent
1 cam? 640x360 -> 70 percent
(changing Stream0 to 1920x1080@5fps and 1MBit does not change anything)
old way, without netcam_highres:
2 cams 640x360 ->? 45 percent
at the moment the best for my little PI...
Am 03.02.2018 um 19:49 schrieb MrDave:
> I think you can lower the CPU by only monitoring motion on stream2 vs
> stream1.? Testing on my PI 2 with a 1920x1080 high resolution and
> monitoring motion on a 320x240 stream resulted in ~70% cpu.
>
> Regarding only starting the high resolution stream once an event
> occurs, I don't think that this would be appropriate for most users.
> There wouldn't be any pre capture functionality anymore and for
> devices like a PI, the starting process would be so slow that by the
> time the high resolution stream starts, the entire event could be over.
>
> For the passthough output, the only container is MP4 and it was an
> intentional choice due to its flexibility.? The configuration
> parameter for the ffmpeg output container is ignored.
>
> Dave
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 00:46:15 +0000 (UTC)
From: Adam Briggs <[email protected]>
To: Motion Discussion List <[email protected]>
Subject: [Motion-user] Foscam IP cams
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Hello, has anyone been able to use Motion with Foscam outdoor IP cams??
Thanks,Adam.?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 01:09:05 +0000 (UTC)
From: Adam Briggs <[email protected]>
To: Joseph Heenan <[email protected]>, Motion discussion list
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Motion-user] Foscam IP cams
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Ok, thanks for the response. Do you have any suggestions on a outdoor cam you
would prefer or have worked with??
Thanks,Adam.?
On Tuesday, February 6, 2018, 7:03 PM, Joseph Heenan <[email protected]>
wrote:
Yes, I've done so with a model I bought several years ago.
I definitely wouldn't recommend foscam cameras though. There are too many
issues with the software. I can no longer log into mine to configure it unless
I fire up a virtual machine running a browser from several years ago. Their
support is also very poor in my experience.
Joseph
> On 7 Feb 2018, at 09:46, Adam Briggs via Motion-user
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Hello, has anyone been able to use Motion with Foscam outdoor IP cams?
>
> Thanks,Adam.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org!
> http://sdm.link/slashdot_______________________________________________
> Motion-user mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-user
> https://motion-project.github.io/
>
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/options/motion-user
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 10:03:40 +0900
From: Joseph Heenan <[email protected]>
To: Motion discussion list <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Motion-user] Foscam IP cams
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Yes, I've done so with a model I bought several years ago.
I definitely wouldn't recommend foscam cameras though. There are too many
issues with the software. I can no longer log into mine to configure it unless
I fire up a virtual machine running a browser from several years ago. Their
support is also very poor in my experience.
Joseph
> On 7 Feb 2018, at 09:46, Adam Briggs via Motion-user
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Hello, has anyone been able to use Motion with Foscam outdoor IP cams?
>
> Thanks,Adam.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org!
> http://sdm.link/slashdot_______________________________________________
> Motion-user mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-user
> https://motion-project.github.io/
>
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/options/motion-user
------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
Motion-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-user
------------------------------
End of Motion-user Digest, Vol 140, Issue 18
********************************************
