Mark,
 
Thanks for reminding me in your first paragraph as to why I send my meager 
dollars to ABC and not Audubon. While there might be a moralistic or spiritual 
basis for a group or individual's position on a resource management issue, such 
sentiments cannot be the basis for management decisions such as hunting 
seasons, restricted access, or collection of wildlife resources. I don't care 
why you like to shoot ducks or walk down a plover beach during nesting season, 
but simply put, there has to be decision making based on numbers, data, sound 
science -  in other words some empirical justification. As I once told a birder 
at Mattamuskeet NWR in NC who opposed shooting ducks unless they were going to 
be eaten, "The state and feds don't care what you do with them once they're 
dead, eat 'em, mount 'em or chuck 'em in the woods". 
 
Audubon has certainly taken positions that have placed greater emphasis on 
sentimental values of a particular group over sound science. Hopefully such 
decisions are in the minority at the present time, but they have occurred in 
the past. One such example is the opposition to increased timber harvest in 
central and southern Appalachian forests that would have benefitted many 
early-successional bird species. It turned out that many older, wealthy retired 
folks turned to Audubon as NIMBYs as they didn't want their "view" sacrificed 
for habitat creation. 
 
Eric Harrold
Urbana, IL
--- On Tue, 7/27/10, MARTELL, Mark <[email protected]> wrote:


From: MARTELL, Mark <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [mou-net] So why did Audubon and birders vehemently oppose a dove 
season in MN?
To: [email protected]
Date: Tuesday, July 27, 2010, 11:17 AM


First, there are many reasons people can have "legitimate" concerns over an 
issue like crane hunting, biological/conservation, emotional, religious, 
mystical, whatever. Birds and other natural resources are not the exclusive 
province of one segment of society; birders, hunters whomever and to limit the 
conversation to only biological concerns is not valid. The DNR is supposed to 
be managing natural resources for everyone in the state, not just a select few.

This then is the basis for our reaction to the DNRs unilateral, closed, and 
surprising decision. In Minnesota we expect natural resource decisions to be 
made in an open, transparent, and honest fashion. Opposed or in favor of 
Mourning Dove hunting?; the issue was publicly debated (for years) and brought 
before the state legislature for a vote. Even if you disagreed with the final 
outcome you had a forum to speak up. Want to know how the LCCMR or Lessard-Sams 
monies are being spent?; all those meetings are open to the public and the 
schedule is posted on state websites. Want to speak up about the 16-19 walleye 
slot limit on Farm Lake? - there are 2 public hearings this month to do so and 
information can be found on the front page of the DNR website right now!

The DNR should not be allowed to make a decision as important, controversial, 
and radical as opening a new hunting season on a species that has not been 
hunted in nearly 100 years without a full and thorough dialogue with the people 
of Minnesota.

Mark Martell
Director of Bird Conservation
Audubon Minnesota
2357 Ventura Dr. Suite 106
St. Paul, MN 55125
651-739-9332

http://mn.audubon.org/


Audubon Minnesota is now on Facebook. Become a Fan!



-----Original Message-----
From: Minnesota Birds [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Eric Harrold
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010 10:47 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [mou-net] So why did Audubon and birders vehemently oppose a dove 
season in MN?

Was there any more biological justification to this opposition than there is to 
the recently enacted crane season? Of course not. Again, I don't have a problem 
with opposition, in the event folks can substantiate legitimate concerns. 
They're hunted throughout the Great Plains with the exception of stopover 
habitat along the Platte river (state of NE altogether I guess). It doesn't 
seem to have negatively impacted these populations, so do MN's birds come from 
an altogether different population - I don't think so.

Onward,

Eric Harrold
Urbana, IL

----
Join or Leave mou-net: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=mou-net
Archives: http://lists.umn.edu/archives/mou-net.html

----
Join or Leave mou-net: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=mou-net
Archives: http://lists.umn.edu/archives/mou-net.html

----
Join or Leave mou-net: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=mou-net
Archives: http://lists.umn.edu/archives/mou-net.html

Reply via email to