I agree - we should try to prevent the image that the 'name tag' of this group is only used to push an opinion of a few individuals. I expressed my concerns and regrets over the inactivity of this group (and the imho too low involvement of the involved stakeholders, no matter whose fault it is) before, and we should indeed be careful to push too much too quickly. Although there is some momentum for change, the situation is also potentially combustible.
Lodewijk No dia 31 de Janeiro de 2012 20:07, Alice Wiegand <[email protected]>escreveu: > Hi SJ and all, > > the board meeting's agenda provides 2,5 hours for movement roles. > Enough reason to meet at IRC after your meeting (and that's what the > table shows). Is it possible to give us (the few people once called > core team) a short summary of what you are going to present to the > board and what is the expected outcome of the session? The estimated > time takes a huge part in your meeting and I would take it as a sign > of respect and trust, if you could share your ideas with us before the > meeting. > > I think everyone involved here knows that in these time we can't > separate movement roles from the fundraising and funds dissemination > issues. Today we have heard that the board wishes to involve > non-chapter entities in the chapter selected seats process. Things are > definitely changing. People are worried. I don't believe that it is > only me who is wondering why things again are going to be discussed > without any information to this group. It would be great if you could > make it now. > > Regards, Alice. > > _______________________________________________ > Movementroles mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/movementroles >
_______________________________________________ Movementroles mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/movementroles
