On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Joan Goma <[email protected]> wrote: > I think the problem with movement roles is that we are covering a very broad > and complex set of issues. If the we could center the topic in smaller > pieces one after the other perhaps it could arouse more interest and may be > progressing slowly but firmly.
Yes. For example: - Agreeing on shared standards and review models -- combining recent work on many different fronts. Work has been done by different groups on a Chapters Council model that was intended to include review of adherence to movement standards; on the recommended accountability standards; on recent internal audits and fairly visible review of annual plans by larger chapters. Others have been working on standards for grant acceptance and implementation via the GAC. If we solidify a set of standards that covers the major issues different parts of the movement face, that provides a cornerstone for many other MR issues : peer review, coordination of planning, share principles. SJ. _______________________________________________ Movementroles mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/movementroles
