Re: PSM 2.0 (PIP) docs now available

[Dan Mosedale]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ben Bucksch) writes:
> Bob Relyea wrote:
> 
> > Very little. We aren't allowed to make any value judgements on the quality
> > of a CA's certification process, or we take on the certification liability.
> 
> Outch. It was my assumption that the root CAs are very trusted and have 
> to meet hard requirements to ensure that.

I suspect that most users are likely to make the same assumption that
Ben did.  I certainly would have if I didn't know better.   Mitchell,
are we totally stuck here, from a legal standpoint?

Dan