Nelson B. Bolyard wrote: > Well, one of the requirements for a CA cert to be shipped in the Netscape > branded browser product is that the CA pay $$$$$$$. This weeds out the > ones who aren't serious. Outch again. Byebye to the idea to create an open-source friendly CA. I guessed something like that when I asked the CAs, if they allow their certs to be checked into the mozilla.org CVS tree, and they rolled out the (virtual) red carpet for me... :-) -- This message is protected by ROT0 encryption and the DMCA. Reading is disallowed and will be prosecuted.
- Re: PSM 2.0 (PIP) docs now available John Gardiner Myers
- Re: PSM 2.0 (PIP) docs now available Ben Bucksch
- Re: PSM 2.0 (PIP) docs now available John Gardiner Myers
- Re: PSM 2.0 (PIP) docs now available relyea
- Re: PSM 2.0 (PIP) docs now available Bob Lord
- Re: PSM 2.0 (PIP) docs now available Ben Bucksch
- Re: PSM 2.0 (PIP) docs now available Ben Bucksch
- Re: PSM 2.0 (PIP) docs now available relyea
- Re: PSM 2.0 (PIP) docs now available Ben Bucksch
- Re: PSM 2.0 (PIP) docs now available Nelson B. Bolyard
- Re: PSM 2.0 (PIP) docs now available Ben Bucksch
- Re: PSM 2.0 (PIP) docs now available Dan Mosedale
- Re: PSM 2.0 (PIP) docs now available Bob Lord
- Re: PSM 2.0 (PIP) docs now available Ben Bucksch
