I cross-checked the fingerprints of my home account: The personal certificate's fingerprint and the one known to Lotus Notes are identical. I only have and had one certificate for my businessa account, so I believe they must match. Yesterday I removed the cert and address book entry from Notes and re-newed them. Still the same. Somewhat weird....
Any other hints ? Thanks. Matthias Kai Engert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > If your certificate is selected there, it just means, you at least once > had your certificate in the profile and selected it. > > The real place to check, whether you still have your certificate is: > edit/prefs/privacy/certificates/manager certificates > > Under "Your Certificates" the list of your own certificates is shown. > > I don't know Lotus Notes, but you probably have the option to view the > list of certificates installed. In Notes, you should check which > certificate is used when you send mail to your home account. > > At your home account, look at "Your Certificates" to check you indeed > have the matching personal certificate you encrypted with Lotus in the > office. > > To be sure the cert is really identically, compare the serial numbers or > fingerprints (click view in cert manager, no idea about Notes). > > Kai > > > Matthias Kubik wrote: > > Ok, > > how should I verify ? If I look at the "Mail & Newsgroup Account > > Setting" -> Security, that's my certificate which shows up for signing > > and encryption. > > Or is there another place to look at ? > > > > Thanks. > > Matthias > > > > Kai Engert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > > > >>I'd bet your profile does not contain the cert required for decrypting. > >> > >>Kai > >> > >> > >>Matthias Kubik wrote: > >> > >>>OK, now here's the message that I'm receiving: > >>> > >>>Message Has No Digital Signature > >>> This message doesn not include the sender's digital signature. The absence of > >>> a digital signature means that the message could have been sent by someone > >>> pretending to have this enail address. It's also possible that the message > >>> has been altered while in transit over the network. However, it is unlikely > >>> that either event has occured. > >>>Message Cannot Be Decrypted > >>> This message was encrypted before it was sent to you, but it cannot be > >>> decrypted. There are unknown problems with this encrypted message. > >>> > >>>This is the whole dialog box I'm seeing. Any hints appreciated. > >>>Thanks in advance. > >>> > >> > > > > > >>>Matthias > >>> > >>> > >>>Kai Engert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > >>> > >>> > >>>>Does the message really say "cause there was no signature"? > >>>>A more detailed message can be viewed when clicking broken key icon, or > >>>>by choosing "view message security info" from the menu. I would have > >>>>expected a message like "The certificate used to encrypt the message > >>>>cannot be found", which would mean you indeed do not have the correct > >>>>cert installed in Mozilla to decrypt the message. > >>>> > >>>>Can you please quote the message you see in that dialog? > >>>> > >>>>Thanks, > >>>>Kai > >>>> > >>>>Matthias Kubik wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>Hi *, > >>>>>I'm sending an encrypted message from the office(Lotus Notes) to my > >>>>>home account (Mozilla 1.1, 20020818). When I receive the message, I > >>>>>see a broken key in the upper right corner, indicating that the > >>>>>decryption failed, 'cause there was no signature. The message header > >>>>>looks like: > >>>>> > >>>>>Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 13:23:11 +0200 > >>>>>Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 > >>>>>Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-mime; > >>>>> smime-type=enveloped-data; > >>>>> name=smime.p7m > >>>>>Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7m" > >>>>>Content-Description: S/MIME Enveloped Data > >>>>> > >>>>>I verified that I have all req'd certificates. Signed messages appear > >>>>>ok. > >>>>> > >>>>>Does anyone know what the problem might be ? > >>>>> > >>>>>Thanks in advance. > >>>>> > >>>>>Matthias Kubik > >>>>
