-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



David Ross wrote:
<snip!>
|
| That's why I use PGP: It's free, including the certs.  But it does
| require that you really know your recipient.
|
| On the other hand, why would you send something so sensitive that
| it must be encrypted to someone you don't know?  Can you trust an
| unknown recipient to treat the contents of the message as
| sensitive?
|

Who says that encryption should imply "sensitive" messages only? I
routinely send my grocery list to my housemate on a regular basis. Is it
"sensitive"? Most likely not. But we both feel comfortable with
encryption and we'd just soon that no one (her employer included) be
able to see our exchange.

Wren


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFB7lEeA/qR4Uok1vQRArNAAKC/mgyc0zimqrEyDCF9IR+GhkeO1wCgtE13
UHWlA/70OMCJDxW0slKY9oA=
=ZM9c
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
mozilla-crypto mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla-crypto

Reply via email to