The fallacy in your argument (there is no contradiction between statements) is that it requires there to be no value to VeriSign's reputation today which is a false statement.


On 5/21/05, Ian G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Saturday 21 May 2005 02:22, Ram A Moskovitz wrote:

> You have repeatedly argued that the value of brand and reputation
> plays into a CA's behavior. Here you are saying that a CA would toss
> its reputation to keep one of it's small (revenue size) customers
> happy.

Correct on both counts.  Now, you are implying that
there is a contradiction in these two statements.



Reply via email to