On 5/21/05, Ian G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You provided a first pass at evidence and you have the means to do better if you are interested In any case you probably realize that it's inappropriate for me to peek under the covers and report so I have to wonder why you would ask me to do so.
I have nothing new to add; re-read my previous posts if you want to re-read my opinion.
OK, so what's your evidence that it is false?
You provided a first pass at evidence and you have the means to do better if you are interested In any case you probably realize that it's inappropriate for me to peek under the covers and report so I have to wonder why you would ask me to do so.
And presumably you agree with the rest of
the post?
I have nothing new to add; re-read my previous posts if you want to re-read my opinion.
