> It is unfortunate that key people don't care about this, but it is also
> clear at this date that they aren't going to care. In light of that,
> attempting to address this without putting some procedural controls in
> place is likely just to be work that will be quickly eroded (and thus
> pointless).

We could have rules for high-profile pages, perhaps, but we would have to
define high-profile.

> Would it be possible to automate validation of documents on checkin to
> CVS (and rejection if they fail)?

Pretty sure no. And we probably wouldn't want to - part of the point of
this exercise is to lower the barrier to entry for people wanting to
contribute. 

I think it's good enough that the high-profile pages validate correctly.
There is no way we can check and fix all 16,000 of them!

Gerv

Reply via email to