> It is unfortunate that key people don't care about this, but it is also > clear at this date that they aren't going to care. In light of that, > attempting to address this without putting some procedural controls in > place is likely just to be work that will be quickly eroded (and thus > pointless). We could have rules for high-profile pages, perhaps, but we would have to define high-profile. > Would it be possible to automate validation of documents on checkin to > CVS (and rejection if they fail)? Pretty sure no. And we probably wouldn't want to - part of the point of this exercise is to lower the barrier to entry for people wanting to contribute. I think it's good enough that the high-profile pages validate correctly. There is no way we can check and fix all 16,000 of them! Gerv
- Re: Website Reorganisation Braden McDaniel
- Re: Website Reorganisation Henri Sivonen
- Re: Website Reorganisation Jake
- Re: Website Reorganisation Henri Sivonen
- Re: Website Reorganisation Braden McDaniel
- Re: Website Reorganisation Asa Dotzler
- Re: Website Reorganisation Henri Sivonen
- Re: Website Reorganisation Braden McDaniel
- Re: Website Reorganisation Gervase Markham
- Re: Website Reorganisation Gervase Markham
- Re: Website Reorganisation Gervase Markham
- Re: Website Reorganisation Axel Hecht
- Re: Website Reorganisation Zach Lipton
- Re: Website Reorganisation Henri Sivonen
- Re: Website Reorganisation Ben Bucksch
- Re: Website Reorganisation Jake
- Re: Website Reorganisation Marc van Woerkom
- Re: Website Reorganisation Braden McDaniel
- Re: Website Reorganisation Gervase Markham
- Re: Website Reorganisation Braden McDaniel
- Re: Website Reorganisation Gervase Markham
