In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, James Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> What we don't want are symlinks. I don't like that idea in cvs.
Does Netscape's server have regexp URL redirecting like Apache?
> 3. The server software.
> Must this site be served up by Netscape software? Can Apache not be
> used if we have the need?
Is anyone familiar with the features of Netscape's server?
> Should we forget the thoughts of being visually-appealling in
> Netscape 3/4, IE3/4, etc., and focus on structure of the document
> while using CSS 2 for complete presentation?
In my opinion, the focus should be on structure and good presentation in
standards-compliant browsers. I think the content should be readable in
Nav 4.x, but it doesn't need to look good.
> Should we use XHTML or HTML4.01 Strict or Transitional?
IMO, HTML 4.01 Strict is the right choice if the content is served as
text/html.
> Should we use tables, or should we be really CSS-orientated?
The current table wrapper has problems with wrapping wide content. I
think CSS is the way to go.
> Anyone got statistics on what browsers visit mozilla.org ?
There are statistics, but I don't have the URL available right now.
However, the fact that each nightly has a different UA string distorts
the statistics. Each nightly counts as a different browser so they don't
make it to the top browser list.
--
Henri Sivonen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clinet.fi/~henris/
