>
>> 4. Do we use CVS?
>> I'm in favour of using CVS myself. The main arguments against it
>> are:
>> - cvs prevents some people from getting involved. I don't think
>> this is a serious problem. People who want to make changes to
>> the site are probably intelligent enought to figure out cvs
>
> Unless, of course, they're like me and don't have any way of accessing
> CVS at all.
>
> I think people who have the ability and willingness to work with CVS
> tend to be (or become) the ones who do actual programming, rather than
> working on Web sites -- which is perhaps partly why the mozilla.org site
> is as bad as it is.
What about a CVS to http gateway. I have planned such a thing and it would
not be very hard to do (there is a VCS::CVS perl module). One could select a
page and would be presented with the option to edit the html, enter a userid
and password, and click commit. The system would access CVS and check it in
with the user's account.
Zach
