> I don't agree it's ugly at all. I really like it.
> What do others think?
Ugly. What people find attractive is of course in the
eye of the beholder (great game, that). There are a
few near universal concepts however that this site
doesn't do well in.
:: It looks like a printed page: there's no balance of
colours. Boxes of white backed black text with black
borders and white backgrounds behind them. Or in other
words there's no contrast (and you only need a
little).
:: Very bold boxy looking with no flow (all the rage 3
years ago). Sort of a pasty Zeldman-esque design ;)
:: As someone else said the number of menu items makes
it far too easy to glance over. MPT can probably
correct me here - what is it - six items is best?
seven?
When I stand back and just glance at Mozilla.org (a
popular first test for any design) it just doesn't
interest me. What about y'all?
=====
.
.
:
Matthew Cruickshank | http://holloway.co.nz
_____________________________________________________________________________
http://au.classifieds.yahoo.com/au/car/ - Yahoo! Cars
- Buy, sell or finance a car..
