Matthew Cruickshank wrote:
>> I don't agree it's ugly at all. I really like it.
>> What do others think?
It's not a Picasso, but it is simple, fast and effective. I'm not saying
keep with it, by all means propose other designs, but I don't see
anything exactly wrong with it either.
> Ugly. What people find attractive is of course in the
> eye of the beholder (great game, that). There are a
> few near universal concepts however that this site
> doesn't do well in.
I'm afraid I find
<http://geocities.com/hollowaynz/mozilla/> quite ugly,
I'd certainly prefer the "old look".
> When I stand back and just glance at Mozilla.org (a
> popular first test for any design) it just doesn't
> interest me. What about y'all?
I don't have a problem with it, although I think it hides a lot of the
project from casual browsers.
JG
