Luke wrote:
>
> Yes. In this order: 2,3,1. I'm not sure if I'd put navigation
> under 3 or 2. Anyhow...
Previous discussion:
2 - Content organization and URI structure
Markham, Gervase. "New Structure", n.p.m.documentation (2000-12-12)
Lipton, Zach. "Site Redesign Ideas", n.p.m.documentation (2000-12-12)
Markham, Gervase. "Re: Proposed way forward", n.p.m.documentation
(2001-01-09)
fantasai. "LT: URI hierarchy", n.p.m.documentation (2001-01-14)
Thomas, Matthew. "Re: website front page navigation",
n.p.m.documentation (2001-03-01)
To get mozilla.org via CVS -
fantasai. "see current mozilla.org tree?", n.p.m.documentation
(2000-12-31)
To browse the mozilla.org tree without getting the files -
fantasai. "The Current mozilla.org Tree", n.p.m.documentation
(2001-01-2)
The tar.gz is outdated.. I'll probably replace it sometime this
week.
I also have a bunch of IRC logs, mainly on URI structure. If
you want to read through them, send me an email. Mind, it'll
take hours to read.
3 - Site Page Layout
Cruickshank, Matthew. "RFC: A Mozilla.org design.",
n.p.m.documentation. (2001-01-11)
Cruickshank, Matthew. "Possible Mozilla.org V2, and definition
list.", n.p.m.documentation (2001-01-14)
fantasai. "[Fwd: Re: [mozilla-reorg] RFC: Another revision in
that design]", n.p.m.documentation (2001-01-25)
fantasai. "[Fwd: Re: [mozilla-reorg] Re: New Look and Feel
etc.]" n.p.m.documentation (2001-01-25)
Markham, Gervase. "Things to Do", n.p.m.documentation (2001-01-28)
Cruickshank, Matthew. "RFC: another design", n.p.m.documentation
(2001-01-29)
Lariviere, James. "new mozilla website layout status update?",
n.p.m.documentation (2001-03-28)
fantasai. "[LTT] mozilla.org main (front) page", n.p.m.documentation
(2001-07-01)
and ensuing threads.
I might have missed a couple, but I think that's most of them.
Current discussion is in netscape.public.mozilla.documentation--
so post your ideas here!
As for Zope, all I know is that they're working on a prototype
of some sort... Gerv would know more.
> Adding content is the other one not on the list. i.e. Getting
> information into the site that's actually useful.
How we'll add content would be dealing with Zope. If you have
documents to put up /now/, mozilla.org still takes submissions. :)
> - Current info for people who would otherwise be developers if they
> could find what they needed.
There's a good deal of info on mozilla.org that's just really
hard to find. There's a lot more info that /should/ be on
mozilla.org, but no one bothered to write it down. Perhaps we
should make a list? A list of information that needs to be
written out for mozilla.org--a very specific list. That will
also help us design a URI structure that will better accomodate
future documentation.
> - Info for potential Mozilla users. Normal people. We want people
> to use this thing, right? If not, I'll bail out now...
Help files? End-user documentation, like all other documentation,
is an ongoing effort at mozilla.org....
http://www.mozilla.org/docs/mdp/docstat.html#enduser
It's probably not as bad as it seems--that page is from last year. XP
