>As Steve Dagley pointed out in a reply to my posting, this is how I see
>him seeing it, Mozilla.org is just a devlopmet hub for the Mozilla
>project and has no real intrest exist in distribution. This is fine when
> one considers a great deal of the work is done by Netscape employees
>and Netscape has an intrest to distribute their end work.
>
>The problme I see with this model is that
>a.) not everyone who uses mozilla is a developer, or mozilla developer
>b.) mozilla needs tester who understands the program
>c.) no "good" end use docs exit
>d.) many people have a negative view of netscape and as an extension
>Netscape
e) At some point Netscape will stop funding Mozilla developers and the
majority of them will scamper off into the wilderness. So the
continued development of Mozilla depends on writing Netscape out of
the equation and becoming self sufficient... or am I missing
something?
- Matthew "awaiting zope where the real fun begins" Cruickshank
That mozilla design: http://holloway.co.nz/mozilla
