"Daniel J. Wilcomb" wrote: > > Thanks for the clarification. I'd like to talk in-brief about how this > could be used to further centralize the documentation effort, rather > than targeting yet another third-party solution. Is is possible to set > up a dummy project called "documentation" and give me access to it in an > administrative role? I'd like to see what this hierarchy looks like, > and see if it appears immediately conducive to the type of effort we're > looking at along these lines.
The URL hierarchy has been discussed at length with the following result: http://fantasai.tripod.com/Mozilla/2002/reorg/uri-plan/desc.txt The organization of the site is visitor-oriented rather than project-oriented until you get into the /dev hierarchy. Much of the discussion took place in September of last year in the thread titled "www.mozilla.org URI structure"[1]. Explanations of most parts of the proposed structure can be found there. [1] first post: Markham, Gervase. "www.mozilla.org URI structure", netscape.public.mozilla.documentation (2001-09-03). message-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3B93FA9F.6030309%40mozilla.org
