Gervase Markham wrote:
> Alexander J. Vincent wrote:
> 
>> Although I have not officially assumed any title of management for our 
>> Documentation efforts, John Keiser has been kind enough to dub me the 
>> "de facto coordinator" of Documentation.  Unless someone else wants 
>> the position, I would like to officially assume leadership of the 
>> Mozilla.org Documentation effort.
> 
> 
> If you would like to _officially_ assume leadership of the mozilla.org 
> (note small "m") Documentation effort, then the ideal first step would 
> have been a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Still, it's never too late. We 
> look forward to hearing from you :-)

It might be good, though, if Mozilla had an official Documentation 
Module.  The module owner system works well in the rest of Moz, it's 
established and, and, what is exceptionally important in a culturally 
driven project like this, recognized as a useful entity.

For the rest, it would be a Very Good Thing if someone could just keep 
track of what people have said they are interested in writing about, 
when they said it, and what happened to them.  I'm not at all sure 
there's anyone who can *decide* in advance what *needs* to be written 
and/or not written - people's time and expertise is so wide-ranging that 
the process probably needs to be flexible enough to embrace whatever 
folks are willing and able to produce.  But if there were a publically 
available list of what people have said they are interested in doing, it 
would a) keep people from duplicating work and b) give those who are 
considering contributing a sense of what's in play and what might be of use.

Whatever happens, it's really important that what gets put in place has 
some "organic" relationship with the culture and history of Mozilla so 
far.  It might be nice to think that someone can sweep into the 
organization and wave a wand and make the right thing happen.  But the 
Moz commmunity is large and always changing and filled with creativity 
that is gratifyingly rich but not particularly conducive to top-down 
management.  In the long run, keeping the lines of communication open 
among the various parties concerned is probably the most useful thing 
that can be done.

Ellen


Reply via email to