> I fail to see how that is in favor of Zope.... As dbaron said, anyone 
> capable of really contributing to such documentation already knows how 
> to use CVS....

A XUL developer finds an issue with the XUL documentation. Do they:

a) (Assuming they have CVS write access) update their tree, make a fix, do a diff, 
send it to the document owner for review, check it in
b) Send a mail to the document owner, who will fix it when he gets around to it
c) Add a comment to the bottom of the relevant page, where everyone can read it until 
the document is officially updated.

Multiply this by several errata.

Gerv


Reply via email to