Approved licenses are the CC Attribution and Attribution Share-Alike 2.0 Licenses.
Is this policy going to be applied to new docs on www.mozilla.org as well?
At the moment, www.mozilla.org will stay in the complete mess that it's always been in. Cleaning that up is a Different Problem.
I'm just curious about the rationale behind the license choice. Why were CC-A and CC-SA licenses chosen over some other licenses that are designed for Free Software documentation?
Are you thinking of any in particular?
Gerv _______________________________________________ mozilla-documentation mailing list [email protected] http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla-documentation
