Has anyone conducted a review of the editor based on the W3C Authoting
Tools Accessibility
Guidelines ? (http://www.w3.org/tr/atag)
These guidelines have been published by W3C in order to promote the
creation of
Web content accessible to people with disabilities (and users of mobile,
webtv, slow connection, etc)
Would that be of interest to developers of this project ?
(meaning: would the feedback likely results in changes?)
We started doing reviews of products already, you can see them
at http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/reviews/.
Thanks for ccing [EMAIL PROTECTED] when (if) replying.
PS: I'm currently using the html widget to type this email in mozilla
and somehow,
using some emacs shortcut - I think it was CtrlB several times- I got 15
blank mozilla browser
on my screen!
