Daniel Dardailler wrote:
> Has anyone conducted a review of the editor based on the W3C Authoting
> Tools Accessibility
> Guidelines ? (http://www.w3.org/tr/atag)
A while back I did a scan over the guidelines, I think it was back when
it was a draft.
In any case it certainly wasn't a thorough scan, though I filed a few
bugs. The tracking bug I created at the time is at
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16397 and you can find the
individual bugs as bugs it depends on.
I suggested somewhere a while back this tracking bug be replaced by the
"access" keyword that already exists, mainly for the browser, but I
think leger said she didn't want to.
--
Matthew Tuck: Software Developer & All-Round Nice Guy
My experience is that in general, if there's jobs programming
in it, it's not worth programming in.
Ultra Programming Language Project: http://www.box.net.au/~matty/ultra/
