in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Henri Sivonen at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 5/24/01 9:32 AM:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alex Wolaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>>> (5) MacOSX only, Carbon Mach-o with gcc/make
>
>> Number 5. If you're going to go for a Mac OS X-only build, then you might
>> as well use the free tools. Also, Mach-O is a huge requirement for the
>> Q.BATi Project, of which I am a part.
>
> Does that comment mean that Q.BATi is going to be Carbon-based after
> all? I thought Q.BATi was going to be Cocoa-based.
>
> BTW, what is the actual implementation status of Q.BATi? The Q.BATi
> discussions seem to be about various alternative UI visions.
Well, Q.BATi is going to be Cocoa, and this is the reason we must have the
Mach-O port. Cocoa isn't compatible with CFM executables, for which support
is limited to Carbon applications, to ease the transition process from Mac
OS 9, which as I'm sure you know was CFM-only.
