Daniel Veditz wrote: > even > going so far as to set up a closed parallel bug system to contain things > Netscape programmers should work on that they aren't ready to reveal in > public. I hope, you are talking only about features that are not supposed to go into the Mozilla tree, right? E.g. if Netscape planned to implement LDAP support, I surely want to know details, early. Otherwise collaboration will be impossible. All my running around to get sponsors for LDAP support would be useless.
- Re: Netscape 6 and MS Intellimouse Welch, John C.
- Re: Netscape 6 and MS Intellimouse Simon P. Lucy
- Re: Netscape 6 and MS Intellimouse John C. Welch
- Re: Netscape 6 and MS Intellimouse Robert O'Callahan
- Re: Netscape 6 and MS Intellimouse Asa Dotzler
- Re: Netscape 6 and MS Intellimouse Stuart Ballard
- Re: Netscape 6 and MS Intellimouse Robert O'Callahan
- Re: Netscape 6 and MS Intellimouse John Welch
- Re: Netscape 6 and MS Intellimouse Robert O'Callahan
- Re: Netscape 6 and MS Intellimouse Daniel Veditz
- Re: Netscape 6 and MS Intellimouse Ben Bucksch
- Re: Netscape 6 and MS Intellimouse John Welch
- Re: Netscape 6 and MS Intellimouse Ben Bucksch
- Re: Netscape 6 and MS Intellimouse Dan Mosedale
- Re: Netscape 6 and MS Intellimouse Simon P. Lucy
- Re: Netscape 6 and MS Intellimouse John Welch
- Re: Netscape 6 and MS Intellimouse Simon P. Lucy
- Re: Netscape 6 and MS Intellimouse Welch, John C.
- Re: Netscape 6 and MS Intellimouse Simon P. Lucy
- Re: Netscape 6 and MS Intellimouse Welch, John C.
- Re: Netscape 6 and MS Intellimouse Henri Sivonen
