[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ben Bucksch) writes: > Daniel Veditz wrote: > > > even > > going so far as to set up a closed parallel bug system to contain things > > Netscape programmers should work on that they aren't ready to reveal in > > public. > > I hope, you are talking only about features that are not supposed to go > into the Mozilla tree, right? I believe that is correct. > E.g. if Netscape planned to implement LDAP support, I surely want to > know details, early. Otherwise collaboration will be impossible. All my > running around to get sponsors for LDAP support would be useless. In fact, Netscape has been talking about its desire for LDAP very recently in .mailnews. I haven't seen any commitment on what they will or won't do posted there, but my suspicion is that that is because they themselves are not entirely decided on what will be done by when. Dan --
- Re: Netscape 6 and MS Intellimouse Robert O'Callahan
- Re: Netscape 6 and MS Intellimouse Asa Dotzler
- Re: Netscape 6 and MS Intellimouse Stuart Ballard
- Re: Netscape 6 and MS Intellimouse Robert O'Callahan
- Re: Netscape 6 and MS Intellimouse John Welch
- Re: Netscape 6 and MS Intellimouse Robert O'Callahan
- Re: Netscape 6 and MS Intellimouse Daniel Veditz
- Re: Netscape 6 and MS Intellimouse Ben Bucksch
- Re: Netscape 6 and MS Intellimouse John Welch
- Re: Netscape 6 and MS Intellimouse Ben Bucksch
- Re: Netscape 6 and MS Intellimouse Dan Mosedale
- Re: Netscape 6 and MS Intellimouse Simon P. Lucy
- Re: Netscape 6 and MS Intellimouse John Welch
- Re: Netscape 6 and MS Intellimouse Simon P. Lucy
- Re: Netscape 6 and MS Intellimouse Welch, John C.
- Re: Netscape 6 and MS Intellimouse Simon P. Lucy
- Re: Netscape 6 and MS Intellimouse Welch, John C.
- Re: Netscape 6 and MS Intellimouse Henri Sivonen
- Re: Netscape 6 and MS Intellimouse John Welch
- Re: Netscape 6 and MS Intellimouse Robert O'Callahan
- Re: Netscape 6 and MS Intellimouse Mark Anderson
