> 1.  3 bugs are assigned to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a Status of
> "Assigned" making it appear that someone is actually working on it.
> These should be set to "New."

I don't think this is possible with the current UI. Is it? Perhaps you
could close and reopen them...

> 2.  78 bugs are assigned to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a Milestone other
> than "---".  It was suggested that all nobody bugs not have a Milestone
> set so that queries could be done using keywords and milestones, such as
> all bugs nominated for mozilla1.0 without a milestone set to indicate
> someone is working on it for moz1.0.  These should probably be all set
> to "---" to make finding bugs that need help easier.

Sounds good to me.
 
> 3.  652 bugs have milestones from M1 thru mozilla0.6.  Assignees should
> work on re-prioritizing these bugs so that contributers can see what
> people might need help on before a milestone deadline is reached.

Indeed. I believe Asa is going to do some behind-the-scenes magic to
nullify these milestones.
 
> 4.  124 bugs have the "patch" and "review" keywords set.  Lets not let
> these patches bitrot.  I know that some of them are in the process or
> being worked on but many are still waiting for a review.

The official line is (I believe) that it's up to the patch owner to
solicit review actively from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

> 6.  673 bugs have a milestone from M19 thru M30.  I thought these were
> going away?  or am I wrong?

They are. See above.
 
Gerv

Reply via email to