Peter Lairo wrote: > > It is an optimal solution if you define optimal to be the best possible cost > versus benefit. Most users use win9x which has virtually NO "Permission > management". Anyhow, the password would be far from not doing "anything". 99% > of unintentional or novice snooping is highly significant. As I mentioned in the bug, Win95/98/Me *can* secure files by using something like PGP Disk. I'd trust this approach a lot more than to protect the profile with some half-baked glass-door security policy as the bug report suggests. Practically every other platform can protect the profile with file permissions so there should be no issue there assuming the admin knows what they're doing. -- Adam Lock - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Password Protected Profiles - VOTE HE... Braden McDaniel
- Re: Password Protected Profiles - VO... Peter Lairo
- Re: Password Protected Profiles ... Simon P. Lucy
- Re: Password Protected Profiles ... Peter Lairo
- Re: Password Protected Profiles ... Simon P. Lucy
- Re: Password Protected Profiles ... Peter Lairo
- Re: Password Protected Profiles ... Simon P. Lucy
- Re: Password Protected Profiles ... Peter Lairo
- Re: Password Protected Profiles ... Simon P. Lucy
- Re: Password Protected Profiles ... Simon P. Lucy
- Re: Password Protected Profiles - VOTE HE... Adam Lock
- Re: Password Protected Profiles - VO... Peter Lairo
- Re: Password Protected Profiles - VOTE HERE !!! Y... Rashid
- Re: Password Protected Profiles - VOTE HERE !!! Y... Braden McDaniel
- Re: Password Protected Profiles - VOTE HERE !... Peter Lairo
- HOW TO VOTE Peter Lairo
- Re: HOW TO VOTE Brad Roberts
- HOW TO VOTE Peter Lairo