Braden McDaniel wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Peter Lairo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > It is an optimal solution if you define optimal to be the best possible
> > cost versus benefit. Most users use win9x which has virtually NO
> > "Permission management".
>
> But I'm fairly certain you can get utilities that are designed to
> alleviate that shortcoming. Mozilla, though, is designed to be an
> Internet application suite.
Let's put it this way, outlook has password protected profiles and is the most
widely used mail prog. People seem to be happy with this solution and don't
seem to mind the "imperfect" protection!!!
> > Since most office computers are ON all day, it would be nice to at least
> > have the OPTION to "manage" my risk.
>
> It is not the mission of Mozilla to give you *all* of the available
> options of things you can do with a computer. The option you want is
> something that I think falls outside its domain, and that I seriously
> doubt it could do well.
I capped OPTION, because someone was objecting to being FORCED to use an
"imperfect" protection!!!
> > Also, at home, I don't want to
> > necessarly protect my entire PC (i usually turn it on and walk away and
> > do other things; when i return, I want it to be booted COMPLETELY - and
> > not have to enter a password and wait AGAIN until the login finishes).
>
> I see. You want Mozilla to have a login screen because your computer/OS
> login is too slow.
NO, i capped "AGAIN", not "wait"!!!
> Braden
Please make at least an effort to read a post before regergitating your
preconceived opinons.
--
Regards,
Peter Lairo
