> Why couldn't Mozilla-the-developer-product have a really great UI ready
> for vendors to package? (AFAIK, the UIs of both Netscape and Beonex are
> practically what is in Mozilla.)

I'm not saying it can't. My points are two: we shouldn't describe Mozilla
as "a web browser" because that doesn't do it justice, and also that
Mozilla the software product made available from mozilla.org in
nightly-build form is not designed for end-users (in the "millions of
ordinary people" sense.)

Gerv

Reply via email to