And it came to pass that Thomas wrote:
>
>
>Robert Ennis wrote:
>
>> As much as I like Mozilla, I don't really think you'll find
>> much difference between the latest nightly build and NS
>> 6.01. Plus, 6.01 has a fully functional mail suite,
>> including a spell checker, which Mozilla doesn't have.
>> Mozilla also has a persistent and ongoing error message in
>> its mail program that I don't think is ironed out yet.
>
>Mozilla has also a fully functional mail suite...and it's
>much faster than the netscape one. And with mozilla I have no
>"ghost mails" in my inbox
>
>>
>>
>> So before you switch, think about what you're switching to,
>> unless you're a developer, or someone committed to daily
>> downloads and working with the Mozilla people to identify
>> bugs etc.
>
>I think the first mozilla I installed was arround M7 or
>something....
>
>>
>>
>> I'm wondering what it is about NS 6.01 that you find so
>> disappointing. It's a much better product than NS 6, and It
>> doesn't have the developmental glitches that you'll find in
>> Mozilla nightlies. But it is NS 6.01, or something close to
>> it.
>
>wooahh....ok: no right click in URL bar, needs more ram,
>starts about ten times slower (java?), and, one of my most
>hated bugs, doesn't stay maximized after restarting. there
>are about 1000000000 more bugs in netscape 6.01 than in
>mozilla :)
And don't forget the frozen status bar: I get tired of seeing
that misleading "Page Done" while waiting for the page to
actually load.
--
}:-) Christopher Jahn
{:-( Dionysian Reveler
I wouldn't recommend sex, drugs and insanity for everyone, but
they've always worked for me.
To reply: xjahnATyahooDOTcom
