Gervase Markham wrote:
 
> > I took the liberty to convert the HTML-file into plaintext, so we can
> > comment on this in the newsgroup.
> 
> This would be _so_ much easier to keep track of if each recommendation was
> a separate bug... <sigh>

Noone prevents you from creating a "tracker" bug...

[snip]
> > Mozilla does this "Accept */*"-thingy. I think it's for
> > backward-compatibility.
> 
> There needs to be a discussion on what would break if we removed this. I
> think it's accepted that we shouldn't do it, but we may have to.

It's silly - but this will result in a political debate (think about
plugin vendors who may like to get their application/x-foo-bar mimetype
pop-up in the "accept" header) - which mimetypes in - which out... the
whole "accept"-header is insane (sorry...)... but a better solution -
negotiation between server and client would at least require another
request/response roundtrip.
But this isn't bad as many people think. Due lack this capability in
HTTP now site authors use javascript to implement this (which is insane,
too... ;-(( ).... Ahhhhhh... ;-(

----

Bye,
Roland

-- 
  __ .  . __
 (o.\ \/ /.o) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  \__\/\/__/  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  /O /==\ O\  MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer
 (;O/ \/ \O;) TEL +49 641 99-41370 FAX +49 641 99-41359

Reply via email to