Duane Clark wrote:
> Mark Anderson wrote:
>> It's utterly unclear, and wrong in either
>> case. The only way to successfully try to work around the invalidity of
>> the link would be to pop up a dialog with something along the lines of
>> "The link you are trying to follow is not constructed correctly. Do you
>> want to attempt to resolve it on this domain or as an absolute URL?"
>> with buttons to those effects.
>
>
> Obviously I disagree. Again, Mozilla already has a fix, and in my opinion
> it is the wrong fix.
Let me add a little more here. I think that as a general rule of thumb,
if Mozilla is going to implement a "fix" for non-conforming pages, as it
does in this case, then it should use the same fix as other browsers.
Otherwise, it should simply generate an error. I think that a new
"standard" for fixes is worse than no fix at all.
--
My real email is akamail.com@dclark (or something like that).
