At 09:05 03/03/2001 +0000, Gervase Markham wrote:
> > For the same reason, if someone provides code for Mozilla to support
> > <layer>, that code should be accepted into the tree.
>
>There's a JS emulation layer, though I don't have the URL off the top of
>my head.
>
>The real question with <LAYER>, and its other proprietary friends, is:
>
>"If we support it now, when do we stop? If people are saying "you used to
>support this", we can say "yeah, but we did a complete rewrite." That's a
>reasonable position. If people say "You supported this in your rewrite,
>but turned it off" and we say "Yeah, because it's not a standard", they
>can just reply "Well, you didn't mind about that _before_."
>
>And so on into the future, as browsers accumulate more and more
>proprietary backwards-compatibility cruft.
Does that matter if its tied to quirks mode?
Simon
>Gerv
===================================================
If I'd known I would spend so much time sorting and rearranging boxes
I'd have paid more attention at kindergarten
S.P. Lucy
