My guess is that [EMAIL PROTECTED] (to whom it was assigned) forgot it
(or maybe he is on vacation or something, haven't checked). But he can't
check it in yet, the patch still needs a super-review (all patches need
review AND a super-review).
You should write a message to n.p.m.reviewers and Cc: the person who is
super reviewing this area (I think [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
[EMAIL PROTECTED] would do, see
http://www.mozilla.org/hacking/reviewers.html).
After that, if mscott still is not responding you could ask someone on
IRC (for example) to check the fix in.
I don't think anybody has done this on purpose, sometimes things just go
unnoticed for one reason or another. But you did a great job, now let's
just finish the work...
Len wrote:
>
> I think someone at mozilla.org really needs to think about how important
> it is to them to get external contributions to Mozilla. I've been using
> Mozilla nightlies for ages, and a while ago switched to compiling my own
> builds, with the intention of contributing by fixing the occasional bug.
> I saw a bug that scratched my itch and submitted a patch
> (http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49164). That was over two
> months ago, and the patch hasn't been checked in, in spite of being
> reviewed as OK. I've seen mentions of plenty of other bugs in this same
> situation (there are over 1100 bugs flagged with the patch keyword, but
> not all of those are "stale"). What kind of message is this is sending
> to potential contributors?
--
Heikki Toivonen