And it came to pass that NeTDeMoN wrote:
>That makes no sense because on a PII 366 with 128 mb of ram
>it loaded almost instantaneously for me. Now with 294 megs of
>ram it loads before I run it
>:-)
What can I say - you're the only person I've heard of that has a
fast load of 0.8
I still see lots of complaints coming in about loading speeds of
0.8, but that's the release, not the nightlies.
>
>"Christopher Jahn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>> And it came to pass that NeTDeMoN wrote:
>>
>> >Mozilla is so fast now (at least in Windows) that this is
>> >not really necessary. The effort that goes into this
>> >should instead go into making performance enhancements
>> >especially on Window loading and startup. I recommend
>> >marking this WONTFIX.
>> >
>> >http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36283
>> >
>> >
>>
>> Says you - I'm running 0.8/Gecko 20010215 on Windows, and
>> it takes nearly two minutes to start on a
>> K2-300/128Mram/Win98SE. That's well over a minute and a
>> half too long.
>>
>> I don't particularly care for using up RAM and resources to
>> speed things up. But I can't say it's reasonably quick to
>> boot, either.
>>
>> --
>> }:-) Christopher Jahn
>> {:-( Dionysian Reveler
>>
>> Say what you mean and say it mean...
>> http://www.hwnd.net/pub/mskb/Q209354.asp
>> To reply: xjahnATyahooDOTcom
>
>
--
}:-) Christopher Jahn
{:-( Dionysian Reveler
When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains,
however improbable, must be the truth. (Sir Arthur Conan Doyle)
http://www.hwnd.net/pub/mskb/Q209354.asp
To reply: xjahnATyahooDOTcom
