In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you want (or not know) about GNKSA 2.0 Go to :
>
> <news://news.comp.sys.mac.comm> (might be even on its pc counter Part)
A lot easier to go to <http://www.gnksa.org/>, but to each his own I
guess.
-snip-
> Basically its a bunch of MIT Ph.D types
When do I get the paper work on this? I think I could parley a MIT
Ph.D into a pretty good job.
> that sit around and decided if you use a signature file with more
> than 64 caharacters in length (including spaces) your breaking
> international Internet laws. Or if its more than 5 lines long you
> breaking the same law.
The GNKSA recommends a /warning/ for large sigs, and points the
developer towards the McQ limit as a common definition of "large", but
it doesn't require that the program use that as it's definition (it
doesn't really even /require/ that it issue a warning at all, a program
that refused to post unless you included a 20megbyte sig could,
theoretically, meet all of the requirements for receiving the GNKSA).
> Some of the threads go way off the deep-end and indicate the poster
> hasn't seen day light in years.
Probably a bunch of stinking vamps, hunt them down and stake them!
--
J.B. Moreno
